METHODOLOGY
In this chapter, the researchers present the method used, sources of
data, data-gathering instruments, sampling techniques, procedures of the
study and the statistical treatment employed in the study.
Method Used
In this study, the researchers made use of descriptive research design. All the variables were analyzed using primary data gathered through survey questionnaires from among the respondents who are residents of Davao City. According to Calmorin (2006), this method is the most appropriate method in determining the level of awareness of the public on the ill effects of radiation.
In this study, the researchers made use of descriptive research design. All the variables were analyzed using primary data gathered through survey questionnaires from among the respondents who are residents of Davao City. According to Calmorin (2006), this method is the most appropriate method in determining the level of awareness of the public on the ill effects of radiation.
There
were 400 respondents who are residents in Davao City. Slovin formula
was utilized in the determination of the sample size. Purposive random
sampling was utilized by the researchers.
Data Gathering Instrument
Questionnaires were used by the researchers in the gathering of data.
This was constructed personally after thorough readings from the
internet and other reading materials. The preliminary draft was shown
to the adviser for corrections. It was submitted to the panel of
experts for validity and after their corrections and suggestions, the
questionnaire was modified as to its present form. The panel of experts
who checked and validated the questionnaire are
Mr.
Nonito C. Dela Torre, MBA, a Special Operations Officer; Ms. Ida A.
Gauran, who graduated in Master in Management, Major in Human Resource
Management and a full-time faculty member at Davao Doctor’s College;
Engr.
Emmanuel Mercado, Health Physicist DOH XI; Engr. Nestor V. Patnugot, an
OIC-Chief in the Legal and Environmental Education Division in
Environmental Management Bureau XI; and Ms. Marichu P. Yanoyan, who
graduated in Master of Science, Major in Environmental Resource
Management, and a Laboratory Analyst at DENR, Region XI. The
questionnaire was rated Very Good with the mean score of 3.88.
The first part of the questionnaire determined the demographic profile
of the respondents particularly with regards to age, gender and highest
educational attainment.
The second part of the questionnaire determined the level of awareness
of the public on the ill effects of radiation on people’s health and on
the environment. There were two indicators in the questionnaire and
there were six questions in each indicator. The respondents were made
to answer the questions regarding the diverse ill effects of radiation.
The level of awareness of the respondents was measured using a
five-point scale developed by Likert.
For purposes of analysis, the subsequent range or interval with its equivalent and interpretation are as follows:
Range of Means Level Interpretation
4.50 – 5.00 Very High
3.50 – 4.49 High
2.50 – 3.49 Moderate 1.50 – 2.49 Low
1.00 – 1.49 No Awareness
Sampling Technique
The
researchers made use of the Slovin formula in the determination of
sample size. There were a total of 400 respondents taken from the
infinite number of population in Davao City.
Data Gathering Procedure
The
questionnaires were administered personally by the researchers. The
questionnaires, which were the research instruments, were retrieved
after they were answered by the respondents. The questionnaires were
tallied and tabulated for statistical analysis.
Statistical Treatment
The following statistical tools were used by the researchers.
Frequencies and Percentages. This was used by the researchers in determining the demographic profiles of the respondents.
Mean. This was used to determine the level of awareness of the public on the ill effects of radiation.
T - Test. This
was used to determine the significance of the difference in the level
of awareness of the public on the ill effects of radiation when grouped
by gender.
ANOVA. This
was used to determine the significance of the difference in the level
of awareness of the public on the ill effects of radiation on people’s
health and on the environment when grouped by age and educational
attainment.
In accepting and rejecting Null hypothesis, Alpha is set at 0.05 level of significance.
No comments:
Post a Comment